B2B SaaS
Audit of recurring incidents
A platform with recurring outages. Identification of the architectural root cause and a remediation plan.
- Multi-cause
- Diagnosis
- 6 months
- Roadmap
- 0
- Subsequent outages
PXL AUDIT TECHNICAL
We review the code, architecture, infrastructure, basic security, observability and processes of your product. The deliverable is an actionable executive diagnosis.
What's included
Analysis of quality, maintainability, test coverage, accumulated technical debt and review practices.
The current diagram, identification of bottlenecks, scalability risks and proposals for how it should evolve.
Cloud configuration, observability, backups, cloud costs, CI/CD and operational practice.
OWASP top 10, secret handling, authentication, authorisation and data exposure. For deep pentesting we complement this with PXL Security.
Real velocity, engineering practice, rituals, incident management and team satisfaction (where access is permitted).
Out-of-date libraries, known vulnerabilities (CVEs) and an update plan prioritised by risk.
A 15 to 30 page document with findings classified by severity and impact, actionable at C-level.
A roadmap with quick wins, structural improvements and deeper refactors, with an estimate of investment and time.
We evaluate agents and models before and after they go into production: accuracy, hallucinations, bias, data leaks and resistance to manipulation. We deliver an assessment with prioritized risks.
Who it's for
We'll help you decide quickly. If we are not the right match,
we point you to who is.
Problem
Without an external audit, technical problems are described in the voice of the same team that created them. That almost always understates how serious they are. Internal teams can be normalised to the pain, founders can be caught in confirmation bias, and suppliers have every incentive to paint the state better than it is.
Technical investment decided on biased information
Buying a company where the technical debt multiplies the real cost
Acquired products that will not survive the next 18 months of roadmap
Teams that confuse 'it works' with 'it is well built'
Stack decisions taken without understanding the real constraints
Changes of supplier without knowing what is being inherited
Outcomes
A well-made independent technical audit can save millions in decisions about investment, merger or product continuity. More importantly: it turns a conversation of 'I think something is wrong' into a conversation with data, severities and a plan of action.
Technical investment decisions made with data, not intuition
Robust due diligence for M&A or raising capital
A remediation plan prioritised by impact and cost
A clear conversation with the board and stakeholders about the real state
Early identification of risks before they turn into incidents
Independence from the current supplier, and freedom to decide
Process
We define what will be audited (code, infrastructure, security, team) and secure the read-only access needed.
A review of code, architecture, infrastructure, dependencies, observability and processes. Automated tooling plus senior manual review.
Sessions with technical leads, engineers and business stakeholders to validate findings and understand context.
Findings classified by severity, impact and cost of remediation. Quick wins identified separately.
A 60 to 90 minute session with C-level and stakeholders to hand over the diagnosis and discuss the plan of action.
Related case studies
B2B SaaS
A platform with recurring outages. Identification of the architectural root cause and a remediation plan.
B2B SaaS
An audit ahead of a change of supplier. Assessment of quality, documentation gaps and a safe transition plan.
B2B SaaS
An inherited platform in an acquisition carrying critical technical debt. Stabilisation and a 12-month modernisation plan.
Stack | Tools | Standards
An audit using industry tooling and standards, plus senior manual review.
Frequently asked questions
Yes, it's one of the audits we're asked for most. We assess the quality of the generated code, the architecture, security, and future maintainability, regardless of whether the project was built with AI assistance, vibecoded, or in a traditional way.
It depends on the size and complexity of the project being audited. In general, it typically takes 2 to 6 weeks. Reach out to us through Contact for a specific estimate.
It depends on the size and complexity of the project. Reach out to us through Contact and we'll give you a clear quote based on scope.
Yes, we need read access to the repository to run a real technical audit. We sign the necessary confidentiality agreements before starting.
Yes, most of our audits are on projects built by other teams or providers. That's actually the most common case.
You receive a report with findings prioritized by risk and impact. If you want, we can help you implement fixes through the corresponding service.
For security findings that require deeper analysis (a formal pentest), we do it together with PXL Security.
Yes. Beyond the code, we evaluate how they behave: how accurate their answers are, whether they hallucinate, leak information or can be manipulated. Ideally this happens before going to production and again whenever the model or data changes.
Related services
PXL AUDIT RESCUE
PXL Audit Rescue
Project rescue. Stabilising, documenting and relaunching products that drifted.
PXL SECURITY
PXL Security
Security & pentesting. Hardening, compliance and vulnerability auditing. Because building well is not enough if it is not secure.
PXL CLOUD
PXL Cloud
Cloud architecture. Infrastructure that scales with you, not against you. AWS, GCP and Azure.
A 30-minute call to define the scope of the audit. The initial diagnosis is free.