Skip to content
Pixzelle Studio

PXL AUDIT TECHNICAL

An independent technical audit of your platform or project.

We review the code, architecture, infrastructure, basic security, observability and processes of your product. The deliverable is an actionable executive diagnosis.

Audit reportIndependent82/100Technical healthFindingsHighMediumLowRisk: Medium
2 to 6 weeks
Typical duration
Team depends on scope
Team
PXL Project
Model

What's included

A modular scope, set by urgency and the surface of the code

Who it's for

Is PXL Audit Technical what you need?

We'll help you decide quickly. If we are not the right match,
we point you to who is.

This is not for you if…

  • You need us to validate what you have already decided to do (that is consulting, not auditing)
  • The project is very new (less than 4 months of code) and there is nothing significant to audit
  • You are looking for specific predetermined conclusions (independent audits do not work that way)
  • You cannot give access to the repository, the infrastructure or the documentation

This is for you if…

  • You are about to invest significant capital in a product you did not build
  • You have technical debt you cannot size and need to present it to the board
  • You are going to buy or invest in a company and need technical due diligence
  • Your product suffers frequent incidents and you cannot find the root cause
  • You are changing supplier and need to know what you inherited before signing the handoff
  • You hired a supplier who used pure AI with no judgement or technical supervision and you do not know what is inside your product

Problem

The price of deciding without seeing the code

Without an external audit, technical problems are described in the voice of the same team that created them. That almost always understates how serious they are. Internal teams can be normalised to the pain, founders can be caught in confirmation bias, and suppliers have every incentive to paint the state better than it is.

  • Technical investment decided on biased information

  • Buying a company where the technical debt multiplies the real cost

  • Acquired products that will not survive the next 18 months of roadmap

  • Teams that confuse 'it works' with 'it is well built'

  • Stack decisions taken without understanding the real constraints

  • Changes of supplier without knowing what is being inherited

Outcomes

Clarity to decide.

A well-made independent technical audit can save millions in decisions about investment, merger or product continuity. More importantly: it turns a conversation of 'I think something is wrong' into a conversation with data, severities and a plan of action.

Process

The 5 steps of a typical engagement.

  1. Scope and access

    We define what will be audited (code, infrastructure, security, team) and secure the read-only access needed.

  2. Technical analysis

    A review of code, architecture, infrastructure, dependencies, observability and processes. Automated tooling plus senior manual review.

  3. Interviews with the team

    Sessions with technical leads, engineers and business stakeholders to validate findings and understand context.

  4. Synthesis and prioritisation

    Findings classified by severity, impact and cost of remediation. Quick wins identified separately.

  5. Executive presentation

    A 60 to 90 minute session with C-level and stakeholders to hand over the diagnosis and discuss the plan of action.

Related case studies

Projects where this service played the leading role.

Stack | Tools | Standards

The tools we use on PXL Audit Technical.

An audit using industry tooling and standards, plus senior manual review.

Frequently asked questions

What almost everyone asks.

Related services

After an audit, these three usually appear in the remediation plan.

Audit before you invest.

A 30-minute call to define the scope of the audit. The initial diagnosis is free.